CONSUMER AND PRODUCER SURPLUS: AQA Economics Specification Topic 4.1

Topic 4.1 - Individuals, firms, markets and market failure

Snapshot of the AQA syllabus topic area we’ll be covering in this post.

CONSUMER AND PRODUCER SURPLUS: Perfect competition, imperfectly competitive markets and monopoly

AQA students must understand the following content [taken from the syllabus]

• Be able to apply these concepts when discussing economic efficiency and welfare issues, such as price discrimination and the dead-weight losses associated with monopoly.

INFORMATION YOU NEED TO KNOW

[NOTE: supporting diagrams and questions at the end]

Introduction:

Important economic concepts like consumer surplus and producer surplus are used to quantify the advantages and disadvantages of market interactions. The meaning of each is provided below, along with an explanation:

Consumer Surplus: Consumer surplus is the gap between what customers are prepared to pay and what they actually pay for a good or service. It stands for the added value that customers get from a product that exceeds the price they paid for it. Consumer surplus is when customers can buy something for less than they are willing to pay in total.

Economics relies heavily on consumer surplus since it sheds light on the welfare and value that consumers receive. By revealing the additional happiness consumers have from spending less than their willingness to pay, it gauges their financial well-being. It is a crucial subject since it aids in the analysis of market efficiency, the distribution of advantages among consumers, and the impact of price changes on consumer welfare.

Producer Surplus: The gap between the price at which producers are willing to sell a good or service and the actual price they receive is known as producer surplus, on the other hand. It stands for the extra revenue or benefit that producers get by selling a good for more than their minimum acceptable price.

In economics, the producer surplus is important because it shows the profitability and incentives for producers to provide goods and services. It records the surplus income producers obtain over their production costs, demonstrating the efficiency and profitability of their business activities. Analysing market dynamics, producer behaviour, and how price changes affect producer welfare requires an understanding of producer surplus.

Why consumer and producer surplus are important topics in the field of economics: Due to their impact on the general efficiency and operation of markets, both consumer surplus and producer surplus are significant. When there is a high consumer surplus, it means that consumers are getting a lot out of their purchases and that resources are being used more efficiently. Similar to this, a sizable producer surplus shows that producers are making a higher return on their investments, which encourages production and innovation.

Additionally, consumer and producer surpluses aid economists in evaluating how government actions like taxes and subsidies affect market outcomes. Policymakers can assess the effects of various policies on efficiency and equity by quantifying the gains and losses in surplus.

It’s also important to realise that when you add consumer and producer surplus together, you get a good indicator of the social welfare (the total level of societal benefit) that’s being generated by a product..

Deadweight loss: When total surplus (consumer + producer surplus) is not maximised, the result is a deadweight loss. This often occurs due to market failures such as monopoly. This represents that economic resources are not being used efficiently. Efficient use of economic resources should ideally maximise the total of consumer and producer surplus.

Where consumer and producer surplus can fail as a measure of welfare: While consumer and producer surplus are good measures of welfare monetarily speaking, it doesn’t tackle some deeper arguments within the field of economics. For example, what’s a fair allocation of resources to one group of people, may not equate with what’s economically efficient in a mathematical sense.

For example, economically speaking, it may make mathematical sense to burn fossil fuels because they are a cheap, abundant and reliable source of energy when compared to renewable forms. When calculating the surplus generated from fossil fuels, the result might be societal welfare maximisation if certain externalities are taken into account.

However, there are some groups of people who would disagree and would instead advocate the complete rejection of fossil fuels as an energy source. This is because economic welfare is something that can be difficult to measure when human beings and their values are involved.

Another example could be income inequality. Producer and consumer surplus focus on the gains and benefits derived from economic activity, but they do not consider how these gains are distributed among different individuals or groups in society. In cases where income or wealth inequality is significant, a concentration of surplus in the hands of a few may not accurately reflect the overall welfare of society.

For example, if a pharmaceutical firm invents, patents and produces a revolutionary drug and sells it at a price where 99% of the available surplus goes to the company and only 1% goes to households, would you say that’s a fair outcome?

Conclusion:

In conclusion, consumer and producer surplus are important concepts in economics because they shed light on the advantages and disadvantages of market transactions. They are crucial instruments for comprehending and analysing economic behaviour and outcomes because they assist the assessment of consumer welfare, producer profitability, market efficiency, and the effects of policy actions.

---

SUPPORTING DIAGRAMS

illustration of the concept of surplus - consumer surplus in blue and producer surplus is pink - total surplus is a measure of welfare and is the sum of consumer and producer surplus

illustration of the concept of deadweight loss - this diagram represents the outcome of a monopoly replacing competition in a market - the monopoly restricts output and increases price - this grants the monopolist extra producer surplus at the expense of the consumer’s surplus - the result is a sub-optimal level of total surplus - this is known as the deadweight loss represented by triangle ABC

---

SUPPORTING QUESTIONS

Give 2 reasons why a monopolistic firm replacing competition can change the distribution of welfare within a market.

When a monopolistic firm replaces competition in a market, it can significantly alter the distribution of welfare among different stakeholders. Here's an explanation of how this change occurs:

1. Reduced Consumer Surplus: A monopolistic company has the authority to raise prices above marginal costs in an effort to increase profits. As a result, consumers frequently pay more for the monopolist's goods or services than they would in a market where there is competition. Consumer surplus, or the difference between what consumers are willing to pay and what they actually pay, decreases as prices rise. Consumer welfare is consequently reduced as a result of the monopolistic firm's power to raise prices.

2. Raised Producer Surplus: The firm gains a higher portion of the economic surplus, which is the total of consumer surplus and production surplus, in a monopolistic market. Because it can set higher prices, the monopolist is able to take more of the surplus at the expense of customers. Consumer welfare is transferred to the firm as a result of this redistribution of surplus from consumers to the monopolistic firm.

In conclusion, when a monopolistic business takes the place of competition in a market, it can change the way that wealth is distributed by raising prices, limiting customer choice, limiting output and diversity, snatching up a bigger proportion of economic surplus, and having an effect on suppliers' welfare. As a result of the monopolistic firm's ability to exert control and influence over the market in the absence of competitive pressures, the firm's welfare is frequently redistributed in its favour at the expense of customers and suppliers.